Advertisement

Airport deal has be come 'the perfect campaign issue'

December 08, 1999

Walt Meares

Politicians and poll takers lament the low voter turnout in American

elections. The reason for voter apathy is the "politician's perfect

campaign issue." What is a "perfect campaign issue?" It has these

irresistible attributes for the campaigning candidate. It is:

1) A very high profile issue for which an editor will always make

space in print or in a broadcast.

Advertisement

2) A contentious topic that generates a lot of pro and con argument by

people who understand neither the legislative process nor the science

involved.

3) Advanced by people with near evangelical fervor on the subject.

4) Finally, an issue over which the office sought by the candidate has

little (an OK campaign situation) or no (the best campaign situation)

power to influence or solve.

We have one, and probably two or three, such issues on the table in

the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport imbroglio. By accident or design

our negotiators left the "look to the east and strike in the west"

misdirection strategy in the Framework Agreement. It's called the ban on

easterly takeoffs, and the people in Studio City, Sherman Oaks and North

Hollywood hate and oppose this part of the Framework Agreement.

With congressional, mayoral and council elections in Los Angeles in

the next year and a half, there are plenty of candidates hungry for

issues they can be tough on. And have they latched onto this one! It

seems every candidate for office in Los Angeles decries the ban on

easterly takeoffs and threatens legal or legislative action, complains to

the Federal Aviation Administration and otherwise makes belligerent

commentary to Burbank's City Council and the Airport Authority.

James Hahn, the Los Angeles City Attorney and aspiring Los Angeles

mayoral candidate, leads the pack by threatening a lawsuit to require yet

another Environmental Impact Report on the new terminal.

The thing all these candidates have in common is the ability to shout

loudly to their constituents about Burbank and the airport. They promise

to clean up the mess. But they also have this common ground: When all

their efforts fail, they can point to the FAA, Burbank, or "the system"

as the cause of it all, because they aren't in direct control of any part

of it.

The final authority on takeoff direction for safety purposes will be

the pilot under flight rules established by the FAA, including avoidance

of air traffic routes of flights into other area airports. This provision

of the Framework Agreement will probably be overturned by the FAA or the

Burbank Leader Articles
|
|
|