Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: Burbank HomeCollections

Village development in jeopardy

February 12, 2000

Paul Clinton

BURBANK VILLAGE -- A $100-million hotel and office development has

stalled despite a hefty subsidy from the Redevelopment Agency.

Almost eight months after the City Council approved Burbank Plaza, the

project still does not have a hotel signed on, much of the office space

has not been leased and the art house theater is likely to be dropped,

officials said.

Advertisement

"I don't think the project is dead," City Manager Bud Ovrom said. "But

it's not moving forward as we would like."

Ovrom and other city officials said they are expecting a scaled-down

proposal from Beverly Hills-based Regent Properties within the next 30

days. They acknowledged the new plans could be significantly different

from the project approved by the City Council on July 20.

Regent President Jeff Dinkin was unavailable for comment.

Regent's troubles come at a time when several other big-ticket

developments in Burbank are sailing along.

Zelman Development Companies will seek City Council approval in the

spring for a $200-million retail, office and hotel development on

Lockheed Martin Corp.'s former "B-1" property.

On Jan. 18, the City Council approved The Accord Group's 253-room

Marriott hotel where the Bombay Bicycle Club once stood.

AMC Theatres has plans for a new $76-million complex, which includes a

16-plex, restaurants and a health club. Construction is scheduled to

start in April.

Things haven't been as smooth for Regent's Burbank Plaza.

Slated for the former Police Department headquarters, Burbank Plaza

was to have included a 300-room hotel, 209,728 square feet of office

space, 68,187 square feet of retail and restaurants and an art house

theater. The project was planned for 3.4 acres bounded by Olive Avenue on

the west, Third Street on the north, Angeleno Avenue on the east and San

Fernando Boulevard on the south.

Since its approval, Burbank Plaza has come under fire for the

$7.4-million assistance package offered by the Redevelopment Agency.

Councilman Dave Golonski cast the lone vote against the project. He

pointed out that Regent's initial proposal, in January 1998, asked for

minimum assistance from the agency.

Developers have yet to nail down a formal agreement with Marriott

International, which has asked for several design changes, said project

manager Ruth Davidson-Guerra.

In January, Regent submitted an architectural plan that wasn't warmly

received by the Redevelopment Agency. The plan did not include the Art

Deco architecture Regent agreed to, Davidson-Guerra wrote in a Jan. 20

letter to Dinkin.

"It seemed to slip away a little bit," Davidson-Guerra said. "It was

mostly just a glass building."

As part of the project, Regent and the Redevelopment Agency also must

relocate 33 businesses and tenants on San Fernando, Olive and Angeleno.

So far, only nine tenants have signed relocation agreements with the

agency, Davidson-Guerra said.

Sepon Istepanyan, who owns the Photo Art Shop on San Fernando, said he

hasn't heard from the agency or developer since July. The uncertainty has

led to fear among merchants in the project area, he said.

"It's really bad," Istepanyan said. "It's affecting everybody. We're

really getting tired of these people not doing anything."

Community Development Director Bob Tague acknowledged the project has

hit snags.

"If costs go higher, there will be changes in the project," Tague

said. "But they've still got a signed contract with the city."

Burbank Leader Articles
|
|
|