Advertisement

Criticisms of petition remain vague

March 25, 2000

Paul Clinton

CIVIC CENTER -- A grass-roots initiative being considered for a

citywide ballot is unconstitutional and could open the door for a flurry

of lawsuits against Burbank, some city officials say.

They just won't say why.

The City Council, with Vice Mayor Bill Wiggins absent, deadlocked

Tuesday on whether to put the measure on a future election ballot. The

Advertisement

council considered the matter after the city clerk's March 15 decision to

reject the initiative petition because it didn't include the names of

supporters.

Members of the Restore Our Airport Rights group submitted more than

7,400 names March 14 supporting stricter noise measures at Burbank

Airport, including a mandatory curfew on nighttime flights. Some

officials have embraced the idea of putting the initiative before the

voters, others have criticized it as sloppy and unrealistic.

"I have some very serious concerns about the legality of it,"

Councilman Dave Golonski said. "There are some very serious flaws in it."

Councilman Davis Laurell joined Golonski in opposing the ROAR

petition. Laurell said he voted no because of preliminary advice from

City Atty. Dennis Barlow.

Ted McConkey, ROAR founder and initiative author, said Barlow

shouldn't have expressed an opinion on the initiative.

"What he's doing is trying to influence the voters by saying it's

constitutionally flawed," McConkey said. "What they are doing is

interfering in the electoral process. They're stacking the deck."

On Thursday, Laurell reiterated his view that the ROAR measure could

elicit lawsuits from the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority,

Federal Aviation Administration, the airlines or other affected parties.

"Why would I want to put something on the ballot that would put the

city in jeopardy?" Laurell asked.

However, neither Laurell nor Barlow would say which provisions of the

initiative raise legal questions. Barlow said he was preparing an opinion

on the initiative for the council.

"We'll do the analysis and then we'll see," Barlow said Thursday. "I'm

not going to go into that until I go to the council."

Burbank Leader Articles
|
|
|