However, likewise back in 1997, I ran for the Board of Education
against two of our current board members, Connie Lackey and Trish
Burnett. I had the chance to get to know them personally, debate against
them, and grow in my respect for their desire to serve our district with
excellence. In addition, five years ago I spent time discussing district
issues with board member Mike McDonald, while also having the opportunity
to meet briefly with Elena Hubbell at several events. It has been since
that time that community enthusiast Richard Raad has joined these
servants to make up our current board of education.
It is without a doubt in my mind that these five public servants have
the best interest of our school district as their top priority. Just look
at the positive changes and achievements that have taken place over the
past eight years. They are too numerous to state in this letter.
Think about this for a moment: how do all five of these board members,
who are independent thinkers, who represent a variety of political
persuasions, and who have served our community through a multitude of
different community organizations, stand united as one in this current
dilemma with our former superintendent? Does that tell you anything? It
tells me they may have knowledge of issues that the public has yet to
hear.
It has been said that it can be "very lonely at the top" when you are
elected as a public servant. And, as a leader too, I know at times you
have to make tough decisions, even when circumstances can make your
decision very unpopular. A strong leader needs to stand by the personal
convictions he or she believes are best for the greater cause and for the
sake of the overall vision.
All the facts regarding this conflict between the board of education
and Aponik have not been released, and it is my guess they won't be
released until the board has legal rights to do so. In the meantime, it
is absolutely foolish to protest a decision we know little about, and