YOU ARE HERE: Burbank HomeCollectionsLawsuit

Council adopts new press release protocol

November 20, 2009|By Christopher Cadelago

CITY HALL — Under a new policy adopted Tuesday, press releases on sensitive issues will have to be brought to a City Council committee before being disseminated to the public.

Following a string of strongly worded press releases in response to recent lawsuits filed by current and former police officers, the City Council on Tuesday voted 4 to 1 to give prior notice to its two-member Public Information Office Subcommittee before issuing public comments on litigation and personnel matters.

Council members also required a reasonable amount of time to review and offer amendments. Subcommittee members could call for an emergency session if they feel a full discussion is needed.


The decision comes after a series of lawsuits against the city by current and former police officers and at least three investigations into police misconduct, prompting city officials to break with a long-standing practice of not commenting on pending litigation.

Councilman David Gordon requested the shift in policy after expressing concern over the tone of a Sept. 25 press release responding to a lawsuit filed by police Capt. Bill Taylor, who alleged he was unfairly demoted from his post as deputy chief after he tried to compel the command staff to address a series of internal complaints.

Drafted by Sterling and staffers in the city attorney’s and city manager’s offices, the press release expressed disappointment that Taylor “would file a lawsuit with such baseless and disingenuous allegations. His personally vicious and inflammatory accusations are absolutely false and we are confident they will be proven so in a court of law.”

The release went on to say that “Mr. Taylor has chosen to deal with his own personal career disappointments with a lack of leadership and professionalism.”

While Gordon and others received a heads-up call, he was not shown a preview of the language before the release was disseminated, he said.

“I think that if we had some input, it would be much more comfortable for a council member to respond to a member of the community [with], ‘Well the council collectively considered it, and this was the council’s consensus,” Gordon said. “I think, quite frankly, it did not reflect well on the city.”

Burbank Leader Articles Burbank Leader Articles