Oh, how I’d go on. I would start by citing any of a billion examples in which writers insert an organization’s initials in parentheses after its name for no reason other than to say, “Hey, this organization doesn’t just have a name. It has initials, too!”
I’d give examples of passages from articles I’ve edited, stuff like “The Organization for Overzealous Initial Inserters (OOII), working in concert with the National Academy for the Advancement of Annoyances (NAAA) and the Federal Bureau of Textual Irritants (FBTI) have created a search engine optimization (SEO) tool for emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and licensed practical nurses (LPNs) to join the Service Employees’ Collaborative Collective (SECC).”
If it were appropriate to rant about this, and it’s not, I’d equate these inserted initials to speed bumps that stop the reader dead in his tracks. One minute, he’s chugging along in full reader brain, gobbling up words as they were meant to be consumed. Then, bam: an ugly interruption right in the middle of what had been a smoothly flowing idea.
Were I at liberty to go on such a tirade, I’d argue that this is the knee-jerk practice of writers who have forgotten who they work for. They see an opportunity to proudly flaunt their dazzling knowledge of how the Federal Bureau of Investigation is also called the FBI, then they seize that opportunity, with no regard for whether it benefits readers.
I would go on about the shocking number of times I’ve seen writers force feed readers initials that never again come up in the article. But I’d be just as scathing in my criticism of cases in which the initials do come up later.